Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online skydiving booking service

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 20, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAFocus OrderError IdentificationName Role ValueScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III digital accessibility lawsuit against an online skydiving booking service in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on March 20, 2025. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant's website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers using screen reader software.

The complaint details several WCAG violations, including issues with Focus Order (Guideline 2.4.3) where 'Gift Cards' and other links are skipped or hidden, and 'Personalize' and 'Apply' buttons are inaccessible. Error Identification (Guideline 3.3.1) failures mean error notifications on 'Contact' and booking pages are not announced or accessible. Additionally, Name, Role, Value (Guideline 4.1.2) violations cite unlabeled and inaccessible elements, such as icons, carousel buttons, and social media links, which prevent screen readers from conveying their purpose or destination.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating online platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. Companies, including those in the recreational activities sector, must ensure their websites are fully navigable and usable by individuals with disabilities to avoid similar litigation, attorney's fees, and injunctions requiring costly website remediation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online skydiving booking service accused of?

The online skydiving booking service is accused of Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) violations for skipped or hidden links and inaccessible buttons, Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification) failures where error messages are not announced or accessible, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) issues due to unlabeled and inaccessible interactive elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses with online platforms, especially those offering public accommodations, as non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits, substantial attorney's fees, and court orders mandating expensive website alterations.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online skydiving booki.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer