Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Hotel Website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 21, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)WCAG 1.4.5 Images of TextADA Title III Website

Case Summary

James Watson has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on March 21, 2025, against a hotel operator. The complaint alleges that the hospitality provider's mobile website is not fully accessible to and independently usable by visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically alleges numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations. These include issues with Guideline 1.3.2 concerning meaningful sequence, where product names and prices in PDF menus are announced non-sequentially. Guideline 2.4.3 Focus Order is cited multiple times for problems such as an inaccessible food menu PDF, unannounced "Book Direct and Save" modals, and inability to complete reservations due to calendar date buttons not receiving focus. Additionally, Guideline 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) is violated due to external links not being announced as such and other unlabeled or incorrectly labeled links, including a generic announcement of a 'Best Rate Guarantee' link. Guideline 1.4.5, pertaining to images of text, is also mentioned for unannounced menu images where content is skipped by screen readers.

This case highlights the legal risks faced by hospitality providers and other businesses whose digital platforms are considered places of public accommodation under ADA Title III. Such entities must ensure their mobile websites, and any third-party vendor platforms they utilize, are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to do so can result in lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and litigation expenses, compelling businesses to undertake costly corrective procedures to achieve compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this hotel website accused of?

The mobile website is accused of several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations, including issues with meaningful sequence (1.3.2), multiple focus order problems (2.4.3) affecting PDF menus, interactive modals, and reservation forms, link purpose (2.4.4) for mislabeled or unannounced links, and images of text (1.4.5) for unannounced image-based menu content.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

James Watson filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that online platforms, particularly mobile websites connected to physical places of public accommodation, must comply with ADA Title III. Businesses in the hospitality sector and similar industries risk legal action, including demands for injunctive relief and significant legal fees, if their digital services are not accessible to individuals with disabilities.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Hotel Website. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer