ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online beauty retail supplier
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online beauty retail supplier in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 27, 2025. Mr. Ariza, who is blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains access barriers that prevent him and other visually disabled individuals from fully and equally accessing its goods, services, and privileges.
The complaint specifically alleges multiple WCAG violations, including a mislabeled search text bar ('search edit scan off space'), mislabeled quantity 'increase' and 'decrease' buttons, inaccessible shopping cart notifications via keyboard navigation, and improperly labeled quantity options within the shopping cart. Furthermore, the plaintiff claims the website fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, lacks a universal symbol for the disabled with accessibility information, and that its existing 'accessibility' statement is itself a barrier, indicating a lack of effective communication features like alt-text for graphics and keyboard functionality.
This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risks faced by online retailers, particularly those with a nexus to physical stores, if their digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to disabled users under ADA Title III. Businesses must ensure their websites are navigable by screen reader software, feature clear labeling, support keyboard-only operation, and maintain transparent, accessible policies to mitigate litigation risk and ensure compliance.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online beauty retail supplier accused of?
The online beauty retail supplier is accused of having a mislabeled search text bar, mislabeled quantity increase/decrease buttons, inaccessible shopping cart notifications when navigating with a keyboard, improperly labeled quantity options in the shopping cart, and generally failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
Businesses operating e-commerce websites, especially those with a nexus to physical stores, face the risk of ADA Title III lawsuits if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. This case underscores the importance of clear digital labeling, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and transparent accessibility policies.