Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Apparel and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 28, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible NamesInaccessible Pricing InformationInsufficient Text Alternatives

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 28, 2025, against an apparel and accessories retailer. Mr. Ariza alleges that the e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users, hindering their ability to shop and access information. The complaint also includes a claim for trespass related to the website's data collection practices.

The lawsuit specifies several accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including a "favorites" button mislabeled as "zero" or "button" without further description, sizes read only as numbers without descriptive context, inaccessible product pricing information, and a lack of description indicating color information relates to a given product. Additionally, a supposed "accessibility" statement and widget/plugin were found to be ineffective in providing full access.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers and other public accommodations whose digital platforms fail to meet ADA Title III accessibility standards. Businesses in similar industries, particularly those with e-commerce websites integrated with physical store operations, face potential lawsuits if their websites are not fully usable by individuals with visual disabilities using screen reader software.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a "favorites" button mislabeled as "zero" or "button" without description, sizes read aloud only as numbers lacking context, inaccessible product pricing, and color information without descriptive relation to products. An existing "accessibility" statement and widget were also found ineffective.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal vulnerability of e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users, especially those reliant on screen reader software. Such businesses may face lawsuits alleging discrimination under ADA Title III, potentially incurring costs for remediation, attorney's fees, and injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Apparel and Accessorie.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer