Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Dental Practice

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 31, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A.

WCAG 2.2 AAMissing Alt TextSemantic Structure FailureMissing Page TitlesScreen Reader Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Nicholas Pagan, represented by Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A., has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on March 31, 2025, against an online dental practice.

The complaint alleges that the dental practice's website contains multiple digital accessibility barriers that violate Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, preventing blind and visually impaired users from accessing its services. Specific violations include the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, incorrect programmatic determination of reading sequence, missing web page titles, images not explained for screen readers, and an inadequate or absent accessibility policy. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to bring the website into compliance with WCAG 2.2 AA standards.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for online service providers, particularly those operating in the healthcare sector, that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses are compelled to adopt robust accessibility policies and implement technical solutions, such as those aligning with WCAG 2.2 AA, to avoid similar litigation and comply with federal accessibility laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online dental practice accused of?

The website is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey content meaning and structure programmatically, having an incorrect reading sequence, missing page titles, not explaining images for screen readers, and lacking an adequate accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nicholas Pagan filed the lawsuit, represented by the law firm Alberto R. Leal, Es

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure for online healthcare providers and other businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, emphasizing the need for compliance with ADA Title III and standards like WCAG 2.2 AA to prevent lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Dental Practice. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer