Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Shoe Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 28, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text ContentWCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard AccessibleWCAG 4.1.2 Name Role ValueWCAG 2.4.7 Focus VisibleWCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III digital accessibility lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on April 28, 2025, against an online fashion shoe retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses screen-reading software, alleges that the e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible, thus denying her equal access to its services and connected physical stores.

The complaint details several WCAG violations, including product images lacking meaningful ALT descriptions, images on product pages having identical ID-labels without descriptive text, the location store page failing to announce addresses, the "Add to Bag" function not confirming item additions to the cart, and an inability to select shoe sizes using keyboard navigation. Additionally, the website's banners and landing page images lack ALT-text descriptions, product details are not properly announced due to a lack of focus, and the site exhibits poor color contrast without a zoom feature, rendering it incompatible with screen-reader software.

This litigation underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce platforms, that fail to prioritize digital accessibility. Such cases highlight the importance of adhering to ADA Title III and WCAG standards to ensure that websites are usable by individuals with visual disabilities, thereby mitigating potential discrimination claims and associated legal liabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion shoe retailer accused of?

The lawsuit alleges missing ALT descriptions for product images, images with identical ID-labels but no descriptive text, failure of the location store page to announce addresses, lack of confirmation for "Add to Bag" actions, inability to use keyboard for selecting shoe sizes, missing ALT-text for banners and landing page images, product details lacking screen reader focus, and poor color contrast without a zoom feature.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, and the law firm representing her is ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for e-commerce businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, and legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Shoe Retai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer