Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Custom Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 8, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: Lauren N. Wassenberg & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level A/AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader Navigation IssuesInsufficient Color ContrastMissing Accessible Names/Roles

Case Summary

Phillip Soloweszyk, a legally blind individual, has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online custom apparel and promotional products retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 24, 2025. The plaintiff relies on screen reader software and accessible technology to navigate digital content and alleges persistent accessibility barriers on the defendant's website, preventing full and equal access to goods and services.

The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website fails to comply with WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards, citing specific barriers such as missing alternative text for interactive logos (SC 1.1.1), inappropriate list tag nesting for navigation elements (SC 1.3.1), error messages hidden from screen readers (SC 1.3.1), and star ratings not included in the reading order (SC 1.3.1). Further issues include insufficient color contrast for regular text and form input fields (SC 1.4.3), visual focus indicators failing minimum contrast requirements (SC 1.4.11), lack of accessible names, roles, or states for various interactive elements (SC 4.1.2), and dynamic loading states not being programmatically conveyed to screen reader users (SC 4.1.3).

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies operating similar e-commerce websites are at risk of litigation if they do not implement robust web accessibility policies, conduct regular audits, and remediate identified WCAG violations to ensure equal access to goods and services, potentially facing injunctions and significant legal costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online custom apparel and promotional products retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including missing alternative text for interactive logos (SC 1.1.1), improper list tag nesting and hidden error messages affecting screen reader navigation (SC 1.3.1), insufficient color contrast for text (SC 1.4.3), focus indicators lacking minimum contrast (SC 1.4.11), and missing accessible names, roles, or states for various interactive controls (SC 4.1.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Phillip Soloweszyk, represented by the law firm Lauren N. Wassenberg & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the significant legal exposure for online businesses, especially e-commerce platforms, that do not adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards. Failure to provide an accessible website can lead to injunctions, attorney's fees, and ongoing monitoring requirements, as well as alienate a significant portion of the customer base.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Custom Apparel Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer