Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 24, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 2.4.7 Focus VisibleWCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard AccessibilityWCAG 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsWCAG 4.1.2 Name Role Value

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO, a visually impaired individual, filed a federal lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the Southern District of Florida on July 24, 2025, alleging violations of ADA Title III due to an inaccessible website. The complaint asserts that the e-commerce website's barriers prevent individuals with disabilities from equal access to its services and products, impacting her ability to shop and access information.

The complaint details nine specific WCAG violations, including broken focus order (2.4.3), invisible focus indicators (2.4.7), lack of bypass blocks (2.4.1) for repetitive content, keyboard operability issues for menu items and product carousels (2.1.1), inaccessible promotional messages conveyed only as background images (1.3.1), incorrect name, role, and value for tab states (4.1.2), missing status messages for product color selections (4.1.3), and unannounced visual instructions for carousel navigation (3.3.2).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to implement robust digital accessibility standards. The lawsuit emphasizes the critical need for comprehensive WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher compliance to ensure full and equal access for all users, warning that similar businesses face potential litigation for ongoing accessibility barriers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of violations including broken focus order (2.4.3), invisible focus indicators (2.4.7), lack of bypass blocks (2.4.1), keyboard operability issues with menu items and carousels (2.1.1), inaccessible promotional information in images (1.3.1), incorrect name, role, value for tab states (4.1.2), missing status messages for product color selections (4.1.3), and missing instructions for carousel navigation (3.3.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risk faced by e-commerce businesses that fail to maintain accessible websites, potentially leading to costly litigation and demands for injunctive relief to ensure ADA Title III compliance for disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Fashion Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer