Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant's website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 23, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Image DescriptionsInaccessible FormsScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnclear Content Descriptions

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on September 23, 2025, alleging that a restaurant's website is inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users. The complaint asserts that the website serves as an extension and gateway to the goods, services, privileges, and advantages of its physical restaurant, making it subject to ADA compliance.

The complaint specifically alleges that the website contains access barriers including slides that lack descriptions, inaccessible menu item and pricing information, and a telephone number that is read aloud without sufficient descriptive context. Additionally, an "accessibility" statement on the website was found to be ineffective and did not provide a viable alternative for disabled users to access information, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses, particularly restaurants with an online presence, that do not ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Companies in similar industries are at risk of litigation if their websites do not provide full and equal access to individuals with visual disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant's website accused of?

The website is accused of having slides that lack descriptions, inaccessible menu item and pricing information, and a telephone number that lacks a full description when read aloud.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case signifies a legal risk for other businesses with online platforms, especially those in the food and beverage industry, highlighting the imperative for ADA Title III and WCAG compliance to prevent similar accessibility lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant's website. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer