Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Restaurant and Food Service Provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 14, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMislabeled LinksLack of Dynamic Content NotificationsInaccessible Form InformationScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on October 14, 2025. The lawsuit targets an online restaurant and food service provider for alleged violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), specifically concerning the accessibility of its website to visually impaired users.

The complaint details several critical accessibility barriers, including a mislabeled logo preventing screen reader software from identifying its purpose, a lack of notification for screen reader users when items are removed from the shopping cart, inaccessible pricing information (such as subtotal and tax amounts), a telephone number without a full description, and address information lacking specific restaurant identification. Furthermore, the website's integrated accessibility statement and third-party widget were ineffective, failing to provide meaningful access or assistance to visually disabled individuals.

This legal action highlights the ongoing challenges businesses face in ensuring their digital platforms are fully compliant with ADA Title III requirements. Companies operating online services, particularly those with a nexus to physical public accommodations like restaurants, must prioritize comprehensive web accessibility to avoid similar legal exposure and ensure equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant and food service provider accused of?

The online restaurant and food service provider is accused of having a mislabeled logo, lacking notifications for screen reader users when items are removed from the shopping cart, providing inaccessible pricing and tax information, having an undescribed telephone number, and address information without specific identification. Additionally, the website's accessibility statement and third-party widget were not effectively accessible.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

NELSON FERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal risk for online businesses, especially those connected to physical public accommodations, if their websites fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines, leading to potential injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs for denying equal access to disabled individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Restaurant and Foo.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer