Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 5, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: Brasil & Brasil P.A.- Lorena Brasil, Esq.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text (SC 1.1.1)Keyboard Navigation Failure (SC 2.1.12.4.32.4.7)Color Contrast Issues (SC 1.4.31.4.4)Screen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Norma O. Gazonni has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on November 5, 2025, against an apparel retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website, which serves as an extension of its physical stores, is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically details multiple WCAG violations, including non-text content lacking meaningful alternative text (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.1.1), store locator pages being inaccessible and lacking proper keyboard navigation (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.3.1 and 2.1.1), insufficient visual contrast for text and images (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.4.3 and 1.4.4), and critical keyboard navigation and focus order failures (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 2.4.3 and 2.4.7) that impede the plaintiff's ability to access product information, prices, and complete purchases.

This action highlights the significant legal risk for similar businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to provide equal access to individuals with visual disabilities. Such businesses may face injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs if their websites do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, requiring substantial modifications to ensure effective communication and accessibility for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel retailer accused of?

The apparel retailer is accused of non-text content lacking meaningful alternative text (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.1.1), inaccessible store locator features and improper keyboard navigation (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.3.1 and 2.1.1), insufficient visual contrast for elements (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.4.3 and 1.4.4), and various keyboard navigation and focus order failures (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 2.4.3 and 2.4.7).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Norma O. Gazonni filed this lawsuit, represented by Brasil & Brasil P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses in the retail sector that operate e-commerce websites if their digital platforms are not accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to similar lawsuits under ADA Title III and requiring costly website remediation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer