ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain
Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.
Case Summary
ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on December 24, 2025, alleging that an online food ordering platform's website fails to provide equal access for visually impaired users.
The complaint outlines various accessibility barriers including WCAG 2.1 A and AA violations. These include keyboard accessibility issues where key ordering and checkout features, such as the date picker and pickup/delivery options, cannot be operated or announced by a screen reader. Furthermore, the site is cited for error identification failures, as visual error messages for invalid inputs and forms are not announced to screen reader users, leaving them unaware of issues. Critical status updates, like items removed from a cart or successful sign-ins, are also not announced, affecting users' ability to navigate and complete tasks independently.
This legal action highlights the ongoing necessity for digital platforms to adhere to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, particularly for e-commerce and service-oriented websites that operate as extensions of physical public accommodations. Businesses with similar online services face a significant legal risk if their websites lack comprehensive keyboard operability, clear error feedback, and programmatic status announcements, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III for discriminatory practices against disabled individuals.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online food ordering platform accused of?
The platform is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations including inaccessible date pickers, unannounced pickup and delivery options, dropdown menus that only respond to the Enter key, and skipped delivery options in order popups. It also has error identification issues where visual error messages for invalid card numbers and eGift forms are not announced, and status messages for actions like cart removals or successful sign-ins are missing.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, and he is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a significant legal risk for online businesses, especially those operating as extensions of physical public accommodations, that fail to implement comprehensive web accessibility. It underscores the importance of keyboard operability, clear error feedback, and audible status messages to ensure equal access for visually impaired users under ADA Title III.