Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Restaurant Services Platform

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 12, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ESQ. P.A.

WCAG 2.2 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Text AlternativesInaccessible FormsInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff ANDREE CAMPBELL has filed a civil rights action against a restaurant services platform in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on February 12, 2026. This lawsuit alleges that the defendant's website, which offers Japanese and Asian-fusion cuisine and online services, is inaccessible to visually-impaired and legally blind individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint details numerous website accessibility barriers, including incompatibility with screen reading software, non-keyboard-focusable interactive elements (like Menu, Order, and Reservations buttons), and a lack of descriptive information for links. Furthermore, the website failed to provide text equivalents for non-text elements, lacked proper identification and navigation titles, and presented forms without equivalent functionality for sighted and visually-impaired users. The plaintiff also encountered issues with content that changed without advance warning, unclear labels for interactive elements, and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), all preventing independent access to crucial restaurant information and online services.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for online restaurants and similar businesses to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to all users. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.2 AA guidelines creates significant legal risk, potential for injunctions requiring costly remediation, and claims for damages, emphasizing the need for proactive digital accessibility measures.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant accused of?

The online restaurant is accused of incompatibility with screen reading software, non-keyboard-focusable elements, lack of descriptive information for links, missing text equivalents for non-text content, inaccessible forms, unclear labels for interactive elements, and inaccessible PDF files.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff ANDREE CAMPBELL, represented by ALEKSANDRA KRAVETS, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar online restaurants and businesses, potentially leading to lawsuits alleging discrimination under ADA Title III if their websites are not accessible to visually impaired users, resulting in demands for injunctions and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Restaurant Services Pla.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer