Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an auto-parts retailer

Case #FL-72353536 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 2, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: Brasil & Brasil P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityInsufficient Color ContrastKeyboard Navigation Issues

Case Summary

Norma O. Gazonni, a visually impaired resident of Miami, Florida, initiated legal proceedings against a prominent auto-parts retailer. This action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 2nd, 2026, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, specifically regarding the inaccessibility of the retailer's digital platform to individuals who rely on screen-reader software.

The complaint precisely details numerous accessibility barriers encountered on the online platform, rendering it incompatible with screen-reader software. Specific issues cited include a lack of meaningful alternative text for images (WCAG 2.1, SC 1.1.1), a failure to audibly announce item prices when navigating product listings (WCAG 2.1, SC 1.3.1, 4.1.3), insufficient color contrast on various elements (WCAG 2.1, SC 1.4.3, 1.4.4), and improper keyboard navigation and focus order that skips critical interactive elements like price and part number (WCAG 2.1, SC 2.4.3, 2.4.7). Additionally, promotional banner content was not conveyed via screen readers, only generic carousel status, due to "Name, Role, Value" issues (WCAG 2.1, SC 4.1.2), and store addresses/hours were inaccessible via keyboard focus.

This case underscores the increasing legal scrutiny faced by businesses operating digital platforms that fail to meet accessibility standards. Any enterprise offering goods, services, or information online, especially those with an integrated physical presence, risks litigation under ADA Title III if their digital interfaces are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, requiring significant policy and procedural adjustments to ensure compliance and avoid similar claims.

Case Q&A

What specific digital accessibility failures were identified on the retailer's web platform?

The plaintiff encountered several critical barriers, including missing alternative text for images, the inability of screen readers to announce item prices, inadequate visual contrast, and a broken keyboard navigation focus order which prevented access to essential product details and store information.

Could you identify the visually impaired individual who filed this suit and their legal representation?

The lawsuit was brought by Norma O. Gazonni, a legally blind individual from Miami, Florid

What broader implications does this type of lawsuit hold for other businesses with online sales platforms?

This litigation highlights the imperative for all businesses, particularly those integrating online and physical sales, to ensure their digital presence adheres to ADA Title III requirements. Failure to provide effective communication and equal access on websites can lead to legal action, demanding extensive corrective measures.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an auto-parts retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer