Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel retailer

Case #FL-72373638 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 6, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: Brasil & Brasil P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesLow Color ContrastBypass Blocks

Case Summary

Norma O. Gazonni, a visually impaired individual, has initiated legal proceedings against an online apparel retailer, alleging significant barriers on its e-commerce platform. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 6, 2026, seeking a permanent injunction under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Gazonni, a Miami resident, contends that the retailer's digital presence is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, preventing her from accessing products and store information.

The complaint enumerates several specific WCAG violations hindering accessibility. Foremost, images on the platform allegedly lack meaningful alternative text attributes (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.1.1), conveying inadequate descriptions for screen-reader users. Furthermore, the site's "Store Locator" page reportedly fails to present store location addresses or support proper keyboard navigation, impeding users from accessing crucial geographical data (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.3.1 and 2.1.1). Insufficient color contrast across the website's background, text, and product images further impairs visibility for low-vision users (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 1.4.3 and 1.4.4). Additionally, keyboard navigation exhibits an illogical focus order, skipping essential interactive elements such as promotional banners (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 2.4.3 and 2.4.7), and a functional "skip to main content" button is absent, causing screen-reader users to navigate lengthy menus (WCAG 2.1, Success Criterion 2.4.1).

This action underscores the growing legal imperative for all businesses operating digital storefronts to ensure their online properties are fully inclusive. Companies that fail to address these fundamental accessibility requirements risk not only litigation but also alienating a significant segment of the consumer market. The lawsuit serves as a stark reminder that digital platforms, when integrated with physical places of public accommodation, must adhere to federal accessibility standards, thereby avoiding discriminatory practices against disabled individuals seeking equal access to goods and services.

Case Q&A

What specific web accessibility issues did the complainant encounter on the defendant's digital platform?

The plaintiff encountered several critical accessibility barriers, including missing alternative text for images, an inaccessible store locator page that lacked proper keyboard navigation and address information, insufficient color contrast for text and graphics, an illogical keyboard focus order, and a non-functional "skip to main content" feature. These issues collectively prevented effective use by screen-reader software.

Who filed this lawsuit and which law firm is representing the individual?

Norma O. Gazonni, a legally blind individual residing in Miami, filed this action. She is represented by the law firm Brasil & Brasil P.

What is the broader implication for other companies regarding digital accessibility, as highlighted by this case?

This case illustrates the ongoing legal obligation for businesses, particularly those with physical stores and integrated e-commerce sites, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III. Failing to provide accessible online services can lead to injunctions, requiring substantial website modifications and potential awards for attorney's fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer