Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Retailer

Case #FLMD-69665782 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Filed February 24, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsWCAG 2.1.1 KeyboardWCAG 2.1.2 No Keyboard TrapWCAG 4.1.2 Name Role ValueWCAG 1.4.5 Images of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff ENRIQUE ALVEAR, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., initiated this action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. This federal complaint, filed on February 24, 2025, details a plaintiff's inability to fully and equally access the website of an online retailer specializing in power tools and related accessories, thereby alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act concerning digital public accommodations. The lawsuit posits that these accessibility barriers create a discriminatory experience for visually impaired users.

The complaint meticulously enumerates several specific WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. Key issues include an absence of verbal notifications for screen reader users upon the successful selection of filter options or adjustments to product quantities (WCAG 1.3.1). Additionally, inaccessible submenus that fail to expand when navigated by keyboard (WCAG 2.1.1) and a persistent keyboard trap within pop-up dialogs (WCAG 2.1.2) were identified. Further grievances cite a lack of meaningful labels for interactive elements such as carousel links (WCAG 4.1.2) and the presence of unreadable images of text on product pages (WCAG 1.4.5).

This litigation highlights the critical legal exposure faced by businesses that fail to maintain accessible digital platforms. For entities operating as public accommodations, particularly those with a nexus to physical stores, ensuring comprehensive compliance with ADA Title III and established WCAG standards is paramount. Neglecting these accessibility requirements can result in significant legal costs, the imposition of injunctive relief mandating extensive website remediation, and reputational damage, serving as a stark reminder for all organizations to proactively address digital inclusivity.

Case Q&A

What specific digital accessibility issues were alleged against the online merchant's website?

The complaint alleged issues including a lack of verbal notifications for screen reader users when filters were selected or quantities adjusted, inaccessible submenus, a keyboard trap in pop-up dialogs, missing meaningful labels for interactive elements, and unreadable images of text.

Which law firms are representing the plaintiff in this ADA Title III action?

ENRIQUE ALVEAR is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What broader implications does this legal challenge pose for businesses operating online?

This case signifies that businesses functioning as public accommodations must ensure their digital platforms are accessible to all, or they risk facing ADA Title III lawsuits, incurring substantial legal fees, and being compelled to undertake costly website overhauls.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer