Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Skateboard and Longboard Retailer

Case #NY-59048645 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 3, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: COHEN & MIZRAHI LLP

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard AccessibilityEmpty LinksUnlabeled UI Elements

Case Summary

Christian Sanchez, a visually-impaired individual, initiated legal action against an online skateboard and longboard retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on January 31, 2021. Represented by Cohen & Mizrahi LLP, Mr. Sanchez asserts that the company's e-commerce platform fails to meet digital accessibility standards, thereby denying blind and visually-impaired consumers equal access to the goods and services offered, a direct violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III, alongside relevant New York state and city human rights laws.

The complaint meticulously outlines numerous accessibility barriers encountered by screen-reader users. Key allegations include the absence of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, rendering visual content incomprehensible. Furthermore, the platform allegedly presents empty links without descriptive text, features redundant links, and suffers from significant keyboard navigation issues, making essential elements like product prices inaccessible. Structural flaws such as missing page titles, unlabeled user interface elements like the homepage logo and shopping cart removal icon, and a general failure to provide equivalent text for scripts or properly structured forms, collectively impede independent use for individuals relying on assistive technology.

This litigation underscores the pervasive legal exposure faced by businesses operating online platforms that are not fully accessible. Companies across various sectors must recognize the imperative to design, construct, and maintain their digital properties in adherence to established guidelines like WCAG 2.1. Failure to address these accessibility deficiencies not only risks significant legal challenges and potential financial penalties but also alienates a substantial demographic of consumers, highlighting the critical need for proactive digital inclusion strategies to ensure equitable access to all services and opportunities.

Case Q&A

What specific types of digital accessibility violations were alleged in the complaint?

The complaint alleged a range of violations, including missing alternative text for images and non-text elements, inaccessible product pricing for keyboard users, empty and redundant links, missing page titles, and improperly labeled user interface components like the website's logo and shopping cart elements.

Who is representing the visually-impaired plaintiff in this federal lawsuit?

The plaintiff, Christian Sanchez, is represented by the law firm Cohen & Mizrahi LLP in this legal action against the online retailer.

What broader implications might this case have for other e-commerce businesses?

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for any online business whose digital platform fails to meet accessibility standards under the ADA Title III, reinforcing the necessity for all e-commerce sites to ensure their services are fully usable by individuals with disabilities to avoid similar lawsuits and expand their customer base.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Skateboard and Lon.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer