Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Private Liberal Arts College

Case #NY-69665100 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 23, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesInaccessible FormsBroken LinksAmbiguous Page Titles

Case Summary

Milagros Senior, represented by GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC, has initiated a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on February 23, 2025, the complaint targets a private liberal arts college for alleged failures in providing an accessible digital experience to visually-impaired users on its interactive website and associated online retail store. The action posits that the defendant organization’s digital platform, which offers various goods and services including college merchandise and athletic information, is not independently usable by individuals relying on screen-reading software.

The complaint precisely details a range of accessibility deficiencies, arguing that the defendant's interactive website, particularly its online retail store and athletic pages, does not conform to established Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Identified barriers include a pervasive absence of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, rendering visual content incomprehensible to screen readers. Furthermore, the website reportedly features empty links, redundant navigation pathways, and a multitude of broken links, causing significant navigational difficulties. Critical issues also encompass inaccessible forms lacking equivalent text or instructions, ambiguous or missing page titles, and an overall lack of programmatic determinability for user interface elements, thereby impeding keyboard navigation and the effective use of assistive technologies.

This case highlights a critical legal exposure for educational institutions, online retailers, and other public accommodations operating digital platforms that fail to meet ADA Title III accessibility standards. The Department of Justice has consistently affirmed that such entities must ensure their websites are equally accessible to individuals with disabilities, a requirement underscored by the increasing reliance on online services. Businesses that neglect to implement comprehensive accessibility policies, conduct regular audits, and provide adequate training risk similar litigation, potentially incurring significant compensatory damages, civil penalties, and the considerable expense of court-ordered injunctive relief to remediate systemic digital barriers.

Case Q&A

How did the digital platform's construction fall short of accessibility guidelines?

The platform was criticized for lacking alternative text descriptions for images and non-text elements, containing numerous empty and redundant links, featuring inaccessible forms without proper labels, and failing to provide discernible focus indicators for keyboard navigation, among other programmatic deficiencies.

Who brought this legal action, and which firm is providing representation?

Milagros Senior, a visually-impaired individual, initiated the lawsuit. She is represented by the legal team at GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What broader implications does this lawsuit hold for organizations with an online presence?

This litigation serves as a significant reminder that any entity operating an interactive website or digital platform considered a public accommodation must ensure it is fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III. Non-compliance can lead to legal action, substantial financial penalties, and mandatory corrective measures.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Private Liberal Arts Co.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer