Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A University's Online Presence

Case #NY-69673808 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 26, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty/Redundant LinksKeyboard Navigation IssuesInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

In a recent legal action filed on February 26, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, plaintiff EDERY HERRERA initiated a class-action lawsuit against an educational institution operating an online presence and integrated retail store. Represented by GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC, Mr. Herrera, who is visually impaired, alleges that the digital platforms maintained by the defendant are not fully accessible, thereby denying blind and visually-impaired individuals equal access to their goods, services, and information, a core violation of federal and state disability laws.

The complaint meticulously details numerous specific accessibility shortcomings on the university's digital platforms. These include a critical absence of alternative text for images and non-text elements, which renders visual content uninterpretable by screen-reading software. Furthermore, the platform features empty links devoid of descriptive text and redundant links that create navigational inefficiencies for keyboard users. Other significant barriers cited encompass the failure to provide equivalent text for scripts, forms lacking parity in information and functionality for sighted versus non-sighted users, and content whose meaning is solely conveyed visually. The digital presence also suffers from issues like non-resizable text, enforced time limits without user control, missing or non-descriptive page titles, and broken hyperlinks that fail to communicate their status to screen readers, severely hindering independent navigation.

This litigation highlights the persistent legal exposure faced by online businesses and organizations that do not prioritize comprehensive digital accessibility. Such cases underscore that merely having a web presence is insufficient; it must be equally usable by all, including individuals with disabilities, in compliance with ADA Title III, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and New York General Business Law § 349. Failure to address these systemic barriers can lead to significant legal liabilities, encompassing demands for permanent injunctive relief, compensatory damages, civil penalties, and substantial attorney's fees, serving as a stark reminder for all public accommodations to invest in and maintain accessible digital environments.

Case Q&A

What kinds of digital accessibility failures were identified in the complaint against the online platform?

The complaint outlined various issues including the absence of alternative text for images, non-descriptive empty links, redundant navigation links, and the lack of keyboard-operable user interface with discernible focus indicators. It also cited problems with non-resizable text, inaccessible PDFs, and pages sharing identical title elements.

Which legal representatives are handling the visually-impaired plaintiff's case?

The plaintiff, Edery Herrera, is represented by the law firm GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC, which filed the action in the Southern District of New York.

What are the broader implications for organizations operating websites that fail to meet accessibility standards?

Organizations with inaccessible websites face significant legal repercussions under federal and state disability laws, potentially leading to mandatory injunctions requiring costly digital overhauls, payment of compensatory and punitive damages, and substantial legal fees. This underscores the need for continuous accessibility audits and policy improvements.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A University's Online Pre.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer