Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Retailer

Case #NY-69695305 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 28, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text ContentWCAG 2.4.2 Page TitledWCAG 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)WCAG 2.4.7 Focus VisibleWCAG 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions

Case Summary

Plaintiff Mykayla Fagnani, a visually-impaired individual, has initiated a class action lawsuit against an online apparel retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on February 28, 2025, the complaint alleges that the retailer's interactive website is not fully accessible to and independently usable by blind and visually-impaired persons, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as well as New York State and City human rights laws.

Numerous critical Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1) violations are identified within the legal filing. Specific issues cited include the absence of alternative text for images, which severely hinders screen reader functionality, and the widespread presence of empty and redundant links that create significant navigational confusion. Further accessibility deficits encompass inadequate page titles across various sections of the site, broken hyperlinks that prevent users from returning to previous searches, and user interface elements lacking proper programmatic determination. Additionally, the website fails to allow text resizing without content loss and does not consistently provide labels or instructions for user input, including captcha prompts, rendering independent access fundamentally difficult.

For businesses operating digital platforms, this lawsuit highlights the substantial legal and reputational risks associated with non-compliant websites. Failure to adhere to established accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1, can lead to costly litigation, requirements for injunctive relief, and compensatory damages, as demonstrated by this action brought by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC. Ensuring universal access to online goods and services is not merely a legal obligation but also a crucial component of inclusive business practices that foster greater market reach and prevent the alienation of disabled consumers.

Case Q&A

What specific barriers did the website present to visually impaired users?

The complaint highlights numerous accessibility barriers, including missing alternative text for images, empty and redundant links, identical page titles across pages, broken hyperlinks, and user interface components without proper programmatic identification. It also notes the inability to resize text effectively and a lack of labels for user input.

Which legal representatives are supporting the plaintiff in this digital accessibility claim?

The plaintiff, Mykayla Fagnani, is represented by Gottlieb & Associates PLLC, a law firm based in New York.

What broader implications does this lawsuit hold for other online businesses regarding digital accessibility?

This case underscores that online businesses risk litigation under the ADA and state human rights laws if their websites are not equally accessible to individuals with disabilities, necessitating proactive adherence to standards like WCAG 2.1 to avoid legal and financial consequences.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer