Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online skincare product provider

Case #NY-69791546 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed March 25, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesInaccessible FormsInconsistent Page Titles

Case Summary

Edery Herrera, a visually-impaired individual, has initiated legal proceedings against an online skincare product provider in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on March 25, 2025, the complaint asserts that the company’s digital platform fails to meet crucial accessibility standards, thereby denying blind and visually-impaired users equivalent access to its goods and services under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit enumerates several critical accessibility shortfalls on the defendant's website. Foremost among these are the widespread absence of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, rendering visual content incomprehensible to screen readers. Navigation challenges include empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, and a lack of proper page titles, making it difficult for users to distinguish between different sections. Furthermore, the platform allegedly features inaccessible forms and user input requirements, such as captcha prompts, that lack necessary labels or instructions. Other technical deficiencies noted involve issues with keyboard operability, such as indiscernible focus indicators, and instances where the website's content is implemented with problematic markup, including incomplete tags, improper nesting, and duplicate attributes. Inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs) and broken links further compound the barriers encountered by blind consumers.

The implications of such digital inaccessibility extend beyond individual frustration, presenting significant legal exposure for businesses operating online. Organizations that neglect to implement comprehensive web accessibility policies and conform to recognized standards like WCAG 2.0 risk not only legal action under the ADA and related state laws but also alienating a substantial demographic of potential customers. Ensuring digital platforms are robustly accessible to all users is not merely a compliance issue but an imperative for equitable market participation and sustained brand reputation.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility obstacles did users encounter on the online provider's platform?

Visually impaired users faced numerous barriers, including missing alternative text for images and non-text elements, the presence of empty and redundant links, an absence of clear page titles for navigation, and keyboard operability issues. Additionally, forms and CAPTCHA prompts lacked sufficient labels, and structural problems in the markup language were noted, alongside inaccessible PDFs and non-functional links.

Which law firm is representing the plaintiff in this particular action?

The legal representation for the plaintiff, Edery Herrera, is provided by GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What broader risks do similar online businesses face if their websites are not made accessible?

Businesses with inaccessible digital platforms face potential lawsuits under federal and state disability discrimination laws, including the AD

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online skincare produc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer