Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Retail Store

Case #NY-70207204 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed May 8, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty LinksRedundant LinksInconsistent Page Titles

Case Summary

Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez, a visually-impaired individual, initiated a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 8, 2025. This legal action targets an online apparel and edibles retailer, asserting claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York State General Business Law. Ms. Martinez, who relies on screen-reading software to navigate the internet, alleges that the digital storefront's website presents significant accessibility barriers, thereby denying her and other blind users full and equal access to its offerings.

The complaint meticulously outlines a series of precise WCAG violations encountered by the plaintiff. These critical issues include a pervasive absence of alternative text for graphical elements and linked images, rendering visual content incomprehensible to screen readers. Further compounding the problem are numerous empty links lacking descriptive text, redundant links leading to identical destinations, and inconsistent page titles, which collectively create a confusing and unusable navigation experience. Moreover, the presence of broken links, which the screen reader failed to identify as such, directly obstructed the plaintiff's attempts to locate product information, pricing, and add items to a virtual shopping cart, hindering the overall user journey.

This litigation underscores the imperative for all businesses operating online, particularly e-commerce platforms, to proactively ensure their digital properties adhere to established accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1. Failure to implement reasonable modifications for disabled users not only contravenes federal and state anti-discrimination laws but also exposes companies to significant legal liabilities, including potential injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and civil penalties. The case highlights that mere online presence is insufficient; true public accommodation in the digital age demands genuinely accessible design to prevent the isolation and discrimination of visually-impaired consumers.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility deficiencies did a disabled user encounter on the defendant's online platform?

The user experienced multiple accessibility barriers, including a lack of alternative text for images and non-text elements, empty and redundant links that confused navigation, inconsistent page titles across the site, and broken links which were not announced by screen-reading software, preventing essential actions like locating pricing or adding items to a cart.

Which legal representative is handling this case for the plaintiff, Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez?

Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez is represented by the law firm GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC in this action.

What broader implications does this lawsuit carry for online businesses concerning digital access?

This lawsuit serves as a significant reminder to online businesses that their websites must be fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1, can lead to legal action under federal and state laws, resulting in demands for injunctive relief, damages, and a requirement to implement comprehensive accessibility policies and training.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Retail Store. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer