Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online electronics retailer

Case #NY-71474745 · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed September 27, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty LinksBroken LinksMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

Washington Moran, a visually-impaired individual, has initiated legal proceedings against an online electronics retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This class action complaint, filed on September 27, 2025, alleges that the digital platform maintained by the defendant is not adequately accessible, thereby impeding Mr. Moran and other blind and visually-impaired users from fully engaging with its offerings. The suit asserts violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alongside New York State and City Human Rights Laws.

The complaint precisely details several significant accessibility shortcomings. These include a pervasive lack of alternative text for graphical elements, which prevents screen-reading software from accurately describing images. Furthermore, the website reportedly features empty links devoid of text, causing confusion regarding their purpose, and redundant links that lead to the same URL, forcing repetitive navigation. Instances of linked images missing alt-text and pages with identical title elements, hindering differentiation by screen readers, are also cited. Critically, numerous broken links redirect users to error pages without proper screen-reader notification, further obstructing independent navigation and access to information, such as product pricing and the ability to add items to a cart.

This case underscores the ongoing legal challenges faced by digital businesses that have yet to fully embrace inclusive design principles. Online retailers, service providers, and content platforms that rely on web-based interactions are increasingly under scrutiny to ensure their digital interfaces are universally accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failing to proactively implement comprehensive accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0, exposes organizations to significant litigation risks, potential financial liabilities, and reputational damage, as well as denying a substantial segment of the population equal access to modern commerce and information.

Case Q&A

What accessibility failures were identified on the website?

The plaintiff encountered several critical accessibility barriers, including missing alternative text for images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, linked images lacking alt-text, and numerous broken links that failed to notify screen reader users. Additionally, multiple pages shared identical title elements, making navigation confusing for visually impaired users.

Who is bringing this lawsuit and which legal team represents them?

The lawsuit is brought by Washington Moran, on behalf of himself and a proposed class of similarly situated visually-impaired individuals. They are represented by the law firm Gottlieb & Associates PLLC.

What broader implications does this case have for digital platforms?

This litigation highlights the necessity for digital platforms to adhere to web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0, to avoid legal action under the ADA and related state laws. Businesses operating online must ensure their websites are independently usable by persons with disabilities, or they risk ongoing litigation, financial penalties, and a denial of service to a significant user base.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online electronics ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer