Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online freeze-dried food retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed January 27, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Focus Indicator FailureEmpty LinksDuplicate Page TitlesInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

MYKAYLA FAGNANI, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated persons, has filed a federal complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, on January 27, 2026, against an online freeze-dried food retailer. Represented by GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC, the plaintiff, who is visually-impaired and legally blind, alleges that the retailer's interactive website fails to meet digital accessibility standards under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint specifically details a range of alleged accessibility barriers, including a lack of alternative text for graphical images and linked images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, and an absence of equivalent text for scripts. Further issues include inaccessible forms, content not conveyed programmatically, and text that cannot be resized without loss of functionality. The website is also cited for enforcing time limits without user control, lacking descriptive page titles, unclear link purposes, and missing discernible keyboard focus indicators. Other violations encompass the inability to programmatically determine default human language, unadvised context changes upon focus or setting changes, absent labels/instructions for user input (such as captcha prompts), and improper markup language implementation. Inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), unprogrammatically determined UI elements, empty links, redundant links, same title elements across pages, and broken links that confuse screen-reader users are also listed as significant barriers preventing equal access.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers and other public accommodations whose digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with visual impairments. Businesses operating interactive websites that offer goods and services may face similar litigation if they fail to adhere to established accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0. The plaintiff seeks permanent injunctive relief to compel the defendant to remediate its website, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive digital accessibility policies and practices to avoid discrimination under federal and state disability laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including lack of alternative text for images, missing title frames, inaccessible forms, text not resizable, unclear link purposes, missing keyboard focus indicators, and the presence of broken links.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by MYKAYLA FAGNANI, represented by the law firm GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that online businesses face legal exposure under ADA Title III if their websites are not equally accessible to visually-impaired individuals. It underscores the importance of adhering to digital accessibility standards to prevent discrimination claims and potential injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online freeze-dried food .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer