Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Footwear and Goods Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. New York · Filed February 24, 2026

Plaintiff's Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC

Missing Alt TextEmpty LinksRedundant LinksBroken LinksDuplicate Page TitlesKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff JUDITH ADELA LOPEZ, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated individuals, has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against an online retailer of footwear and other goods in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2026. The complaint alleges that the defendant's interactive e-commerce website is not fully accessible to and independently usable by blind and visually-impaired persons, thereby denying them equal access to its products and services under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), New York State Human Rights Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and New York State General Business Law.

The lawsuit specifically details multiple accessibility barriers encountered by the plaintiff, including a lack of alternative text (alt-text) for graphical images and captcha prompts, empty links containing no text, redundant links leading to the same URL, and linked images missing alt-text. Furthermore, the complaint asserts that many pages on the website feature identical title elements, making it difficult for screen readers to distinguish between them, and a host of broken links, which hinder navigation and prevent users from returning to their original searches. These issues collectively prevent visually-impaired individuals from fully enjoying the goods and services offered by the online platform.

This legal action underscores the ongoing risk for online businesses that fail to maintain accessible websites. Companies, particularly those operating e-commerce platforms, must ensure their digital presence complies with ADA Title III and related state and local accessibility standards to avoid potential lawsuits, significant legal costs, injunctive relief mandating costly website overhauls, and compensatory damages and fines. Proactive implementation of WCAG 2.0 guidelines is crucial for ensuring equitable access for all users and mitigating legal exposure.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of lacking alternative text for images and captcha prompts, having empty links without text, redundant links, linked images missing alt-text, duplicate page titles, and broken links, all of which hinder screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by JUDITH ADELA LOPEZ, represented by the law firm GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar online businesses of facing ADA Title III lawsuits, demanding injunctive relief for website modifications, and potential financial penalties including compensatory damages, civil penalties, and attorney's fees for non-compliance with accessibility standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Footwear and Goods.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer